You: I admit that your argument is interesting, but it is seriously flawed. Quantum physics tells us that there are some actions, such as the decay of radioactive particles or the creation of particle/anti-particle pairs, that happen completely at random. Therefore there can be action without an actor.

Aaron: Although such actions may seem random to a human, there are actors behind them. Even though we pretend that the flipping of a coin is random, a scientist, given enough information, could predict the outcome every time. Just because we cannot currently predict when these things will happen, that does not prove that there is no reason for them to be happening. If it turns out that we can never predict when these things will happen, then we can only assume that God is causing them to happen because it is illogical to say that there is no action without an actor.

How do you respond?

  1. How can you prove that? Go
  2. You cannot use God in your argument. Go
  3. There is nothing illogical about action without an actor. Go