You: How would you go about proving to me that there is no action without an actor when I have just given you an example of action without an actor? It is true that out knowledge of this subject may change in the future, but since there is no reason to change that knowledge now, insisting that your "law" of cause is correct amounts to nothing more than a statement of dogma.

Aaron: Men of science and learning have known for thousands of years that there is no reaction without action, therefore there must be an acting force and if we cannot detect it, then it must be God.

You: You have not said anything that we have not discussed before. I cannot believe that there is no action without an actor just because people have believed it for thousands of years or because intelligent people believed it. I must have more concrete information.

Since you are making no headway against me, I suggest that you move on to another argument.

Aaron: As you seem unable to understand the point I am trying to make, I have no choice but to agree to a change of subject.