You: God would not be perfect if he were without weaknesses. He would have no conflict, nothing to keep him stimulated, no challenges to live up to. How can we say that God is good if he is never tempted to be evil?

Aaron: Such desires as stimulation, temptation and, now that I think of it, companionship, are things that a being such as God is well beyond. You are trying to think of him in human terms; trying to describe a perfect being who is human in nature. That is not at all appropriate.

You: Because I know nothing other than human intelligence, I cannot know God any other way. Saying that he would have different qualities only says that he has qualities that I cannot understand, rendering me incapable of judging him perfect. Therefore I cannot know that he "necessarily" exists.

Aaron: On the contrary, we would expect a perfect being to be beyond our comprehension.

You: No, I would say that a perfect being should be perfectly comprehensible.

Aaron: Then we have reached an impasse. I wish that you would stop being so stubborn. Let's see, how else can I explain. I know...